Chrisforliberty's Blog

(Originally published April, 2009)

“Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.”
Joseph Goebbels, Nazi minister of propaganda

Did you notice all the talk last month about the evil Chinese and Koreans? Then it was the “evil” people of Somalia for the past few weeks?
Have you noticed the recent news about the “Pig Flu”? Basically for the next week or so, we are going to be indundated with stories about people getting pig flu, virus or whatever word you want to use.

It could be the Reichstag Fire. It could be the evil Jews on Monday and the evil Arabs on Friday. Next week, it could be you. So what is going on?

I’ve worked in television and newspapers, so I know first-hand how public information can be manipulated in order to produce a desired result or response. People who work in government are efficient in the sense they can rationalize their responses to a crisis and get the talking points out to the public. The talking points from the memo get repeated around the water cooler, from the talk shows, cook-outs, so on and so on.

This does not mean that every single reporter, newspaper editor or camera man is “in on it”. The media can be used for good purposes as well as bad purposes. It is just that many people in the position to call the shots these days as in the past are agenda driven, adhere to loyalty to political parties or are rather friendly with the people who run the power structure thus ensuring access for exclusive interviews, feeders on stories and invitations to awards dinners among other things.

Nothing gets run unless it has approval. Now it can be anything from football scores, a 5 year old girl winning a spelling bee, to this. The fact of the matter is that we are dealing with nothing more than constant repeating of the same story. Ever notice that all the major media outlooks say the same thing? That is a clue that you are being mislead or lied to. This is called Media Manipulation. Specifically, this is Distraction by phenomenon. Think “Wag The Dog”.

It is also important to keep in mind that it isn’t what they are telling you that is the problem as much as what they are NOT telling you. Hence, lying by omission. Ask yourself this: what other events were going on Saturday? I think it has something to do with the Federal Reserve.

What is going on is that various governments have been keeping core samples derived from lab experiments and at a pre-determined time, they would release it hence the timing of all this aka the anthrax scare. What is also happening is that all the reported cases of pig flu are in fact not pig flu at all, but nothing more than cases of common colds. Essentially a non-event. Keep in mind this is all happening less than a week after Hitler’s 120th birthday.

This “crisis” is all designed to create a crisis and further erode the economy or at least explain why corporate profits are down (other than the corporations own mismanagement), trampling of civil rights, inducing a mass panic, etc… The CDC, FEMA and other agencies in the alphabet soup will claim there is a crisis of “epic proportions” and then use their own manufactured crisis to justify more powers to do these things. Can you say internment camp? Look up H.R. 645 sponsored by Alcee Hastings of Florida.

This particular “crisis” is livestock-related, so expect more push for government oversight of farms. Big industrial farms will welcome this, because they have big lobbies to get exemptions just as Monsanto is welcoming the oversight of seeds and you guessed it, pigs. As in the “Pig Patent“. In 2005, Monsanto had filed two patents for processes which controlled the breeding and the herds of pigs. This resulted in Monsanto being under scrutiny for ownership rights over pigs and their offspring. Monsanto was planning to create improved designer animals for human consumption using special breeding techniques. Monsanto was able to control breeds with specific characteristics as per the patent, and disallowing other breeders and farmers from doing so. The patent, being broad, remained unclear about the ownership of the proceeds from the sale of the pigs by farmers. It did not mention the royalties involved when a food producer produces sausages (as an example) using those pigs which are bred using Monsanto’s process. This was a source of royalty for Monsanto. Monsanto wanted to cash in on the growing consumer demand for meat products globally and many activists question the ethics of Monsanto’s actions.

So live your life and don’t listen to the naysayers. Likewise, be diligent in protecting your rights and liberties.

By Sheriff Richard Mack

On January 8, 2011, Federal District Judge John Roll was gunned down by a maniacal coward lunatic. Since this unspeakable and unimaginable tragedy much has been said about who caused this tragedy or who may have prompted its occurrence. Some of this rhetoric bordered on the absurd.

I would much rather talk about the good people who had their lives snuffed out before their time and to pay tribute to who they were and what they stood for. Certainly, a beautiful little nine year old angel, named Christina Green, deserves to have her life displayed as an example to others to learn from and enjoy. So, I will do that regarding a man who changed my life and helped alter American history; Judge John M. Roll. He was an honest man and a principled judge. He stood for what he believed was right despite the possible consequences. I met Judge Roll back in 1994, in fact, it was in his courtroom. He was the judge who first heard my lawsuit against the Clinton Administration. Judge Roll had the courage to take a strong stand against the very entity that controlled his salary and career. He actually had the audacity to tell Congress and President Clinton that they exceeded their authority when they made the Brady bill a law.

I was extremely nervous when I walked into Judge Roll’s courtroom. There was a big crowd of supporters and numerous reporters and cameras outside the courthouse. Although I had been to court many times before, this was the first time it was in front of such a crowd of onlookers and the Press and in Federal court. I remember looking at Judge Roll and relaxing somewhat; he was nice looking and rather young, about my age. He had already defended me with at least two pretrial motions that he ruled on, both in my favor. The first one was the Federal Government’s attempt to remove me from the case entirely by claiming I had no standing to sue them in the first place. They argued that only the county’s Board of Supervisors could represent the county in such legal actions. Judge Roll said this was wrong because it was the sheriff being commandeered by the Federal Government, both officially and personally. Next, my lawyer asked for an injunction against the government from being able to arrest me for “failure to comply.” (There was an actual provision in the Brady bill that threatened to arrest the sheriffs if we failed to comply with this unfunded mandate from Congress.) Judge Roll seemed legitimately concerned about this threat throughout the entire lawsuit. Janet Reno herself wrote a memo to the Judge and assured him that the Feds had no intention of arresting me and that the threat of arrest within the language of the Brady bill, was only intended for the gun shop owners, not the sheriffs. Judge Roll, as he announced his decision regarding the injunction said that Janet Reno was not allowed to change the law “by fiat” nor interpret the law for Congress. “Mack’s injunction is hereby granted,” the Judge said calmly and sternly.

Then as the hearing proceeded I was called to the stand. The butterflies returned big time. As the Justice Department’s lawyer cross examined me, she did something unusual; she actually began to address the Judge while I am still sitting on the stand. She said, “why your honor, already in just the first four months of the implementation of the Brady background checks, we have denied over 250,000 felons from gaining access to handguns in this country.” I was thinking to myself what a crock her numbers were and wondering why we had so many felons on the streets all trying to buy handguns in government checked gun shops. Suddenly, Judge Roll interrupted the attorney and rebuked her with, “Counselor, do not pretend in this courtroom that your statistical analysis somehow equates to constitutionality.” I have to say that Roll’s understanding of principles amazed me. He was so professional and knowledgeable. He took his job and the Constitution so seriously. He was truly an exemplary Justice.

When Judge Roll issued his ruling on the Mack v. US case on June 28, 1994, he said two things that absolutely floored me. The first one was the order of the court which summarized his findings:

“The Court finds that in enacting [the Brady bill] Congress exceeded its authority under Article 1, section 8 of the United States Constitution, thereby impermissibly encroaching upon the powers retained by the states pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. The Court further finds that the provision, in conjunction with the criminal sanctions its violation would engender, is unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

Judge Roll, of all the dozens of Judges who had heard this case from me and the other six sheriff defendants, was the only one who ruled that the Brady bill violated the Fifth Amendment as well as the Tenth. It was pursuant to Judge Roll’s insight and sensitivity to the threat this “law” posed to us, the sheriffs, that this case made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

When I read the other Judge Roll principle, it truly brought me to understand how astonishing this man really was. He said:

“Mack is thus forced to choose between keeping his oath or obeying the act, subjecting himself to possible sanctions.”

To have a federal Judge actually grasp the full extent of my personal motivation for filing this case was absolutely remarkable. He touched my soul with this comment and it is recorded in my books and memory forever. He was truly before his time. Now, his work is a part of American history. His legacy should be one of honesty, courage, and living up to his oath as a true defender of our nation’s rule of law. He changed my life and showed us all that the Constitution is still the supreme law of the land.

++++++++++++++++++

And so I ask, is it possible that this will go down as yet another government “conspiracy” to silence those that do not comply? I find it interesting that no mention of Judge Roll’s judicial proceedings/determinations have made it to the lamestream media yet. Seems to this theorist, that the media were too quick to blanket the marketshare with rehashed 2nd  Amendment “evils” than to shed light on the irony that Judge Roll was pro 2nd Amendment and his many court decisions to stand against federal intrusion.

(Editor’s Note: Rep. Giffords was also Pro 2nd Amendment too. If any political statement was to be gathered from this, it further explains why it is good for us to be well-armed)

“You know, George, you’d have made a great Marshal for Napoleon, if you’d lived in the 18th Century.”

“Oh, but I did, Sir Alex, I did.”

(Based on a dream)

I’ve known for quite some time that I am not of the 21st century. My body is here, but my mind and spirit are elsewhere. I would have been a farmer/frontiersman in the 18th century. Otherwise, I would be working as a newspaper reporter during the Roaring 20′s reporting on the exploits of the New York Yankees, Red Grange and Al Capone. When the night rolled around, I would have put on my hat and three pieced suit, hit the speakeasies and kissed away. Given that I would have been a reporter with my nose to the ground, I would known of every nook, cranny and password in town. Then I would have moved to Hollywood where I would have worked for the next 40 or 50 years. On top of that, I would have married Barbara Stanwyck and probably had affairs with Ginger Rogers, Rita Hayworth, Deborah Kerr and/or Joan Leslie. If you are going to cheat on your spouse (in my case, we could talk it over), you had better make it worth your while. I probably would have been making films for the war effort or traveling in order to document the war while passing around copies of “War is a Racket”.

The following is a partial conversation I would have had if we had that moment in time when we could have met. The setting is a cafe/tavern in Casablanca. George would have be smoking a cigar and enjoying brandy.          I would have been a non-smoker (rare in the 1940′s) and carrying around a bottle of Old No. 7.

“George. Congratulations on your speech this morning. Do you really think we can win this war. I mean, those Germans are not to be messed with.”

“Well, Chris. In our present state of being and mind, no! But God have it, I will whip these boys into the finest son of a bitches God has ever known. By God, I will.”

“I wish you the best. If anyone in this army can do it, it is you. Granted, I don’t care for your profanity and I hate war. But I appreciate your tactfulness and outright display of honesty. I can tell you don’t walk around with a fashion consultant and speech writer.”

“I am my own man. How’s life with Barbara?”

“It is good all things considered. We still get the same love bugs and twinkle eyes even after knowing each other for almost 15 years. I will never forget laying eyes on her the first time when “The Locked Door” came out. Little did I know that within a few months, I would be heading to Hollywood and the rest is history. I was fired from my job all because I expressed interest in writing a series of articles on what was causing the Stock Market crash. Apparently, economics is a subject matter that only experts should know about. I mean who gets excited about fractional reserve banking, interest rates or manipulation of gold prices?”

“Gold! I love Gold! What’s Barbara doing nowadays?”

“She has recently accepted a part, something to do with insurance. It isn’t titled yet. Given the average timetable for movies, it should be out in another year or so.

“Insurance? Yeah the stuff people get excited about. I’m sure she will make people get excited about insurance.”

“George, when do you think the war will be over?”

“I don’t have a crystal ball, but if we get our act together given what potential we can muster from our industrial might, discipline and duty, we could finish before the decade is out. Speaking of time, I need to check on the barracks very soon. Those boys shouldn’t be getting too excited about their posters. Because they won’t be around if I find them.”

“Forgive them for being young. You only live once.”

“You live forever. I was alive in the 1st century before Christ, the 9th, the 16th, 18th and fought alongside Stonewall Jackson too.”

“I need to leave now. My boss is expecting my script by tomorrow afternoon and you have barracks duty. So I will let you go.”

“It was good to meet you and sleep well. I won’t if the boys aren’t asleep by midnight.”

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control… Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” Congressman Larry P. McDonald, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was ‘shot down by the Soviets’

Do you believe there is a global conspiracy amongst the Jews to take over the world? Do you think every Muslim is “in on it”? Do you think Christian missionaries are going all over the world converting non-Christians because of dictates from the governments of the nations that the Christians (whether they are truly changed in Christ is another matter) come from?

The simple fact is that there have always been those individuals who have been interested in conquering lands, establishing trade relations, military alliances going back thousands of years.  In ancient times, religion was a useful tool to organize society and ensure uninterrupted harmony amongst the masses. All of life was centered around the emperor, king or queen who falsely claimed to be God’s emissary on Earth.  The main motives for inciting a war were mostly for power, to distract the people from internal corruption and scandal and to generally enrich oneself and their friends while claiming it was being done to protect the nation’s interest. Among the Romans, war was a method to keep internal dissension to a minimum and to distract the masses under the banner of patriotism and victory.  All over Europe for thousands of years, the people were enslaved under the guise of liberating or protecting them.

In modern times, the motives for war are the same.  Only in this case, it is a business-government partnership or what we would call fascism which is combined with the tenets of communism.

In a lot of ways, politics is similar to theatre, movie making, carnivals and what not. One movie that never gets old for me is Network. It is art imitating life.

Now let’s take for instance when a presidential candidate or the president visits your city. Do you think they just arbitrarily decided to visit just to take in the sights? Presidents and politicians in general are figureheads. The Chief of Staff tells them where to go, advisors tell them what to think, speechwriters tell them what to say, and consultants tell them what to wear. While the press release may be sent out a few days before the visit, the planning occurred several weeks before. The Secret Service and travel office are sent ahead to scout the location and plan the routes, line the supporters up, and so and so on.

A few people make the decisions and the rest follow. It is true whether you are in a family, school, work, government, etc… While it may not be a big deal for you to get up and back on the field at 7 a.m. because the head football coach said that was when practice was going to begin, where does one draw the line? Where does one start to take personal responsibility in matters of what you buy, whom you buy from, health, your relationship with God or the Gods, etc…? Do you make decisions based on fitting into your society? Self-preservation? Comfort? Or do you make decisions at least based in part on principle? Doing the right thing? Answering to one master?

In a nutshell, if you believe there is a Christian, Jewish or Muslim conspiracy to take over the world, you might want to turn off the TV. If every single Christian, Jew or Muslim wanted to take over the world, that would have been done so centuries ago.  Starting wars for conquest or “civilizing” them as the propaganda claims takes influence and influence requires money and being in high places. Hardly the kind of thing that a person who lives a hand to mouth existence is going to be able to pull off.

What we are dealing with are a few thousand individuals who belong to organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission. Bullets will come in handy when putting one in the back of their heads or defending off their henchmen or the masses who just blindly go along with it. But no folks!  There is no Christian, Jewish or Muslim conspiracy to take over the world. We are in fact dealing with an oligarchy that has been in place for several centuries and this oligarchy seeks to maintain the old world of the elites albeit behind the scenes.

Whether it is common knowledge or not, it has long been noted that the United States government is first and foremost responsible for just about every major terror organization in existence today or during the past 50 years. The list is too numerous, but I will cite some examples.

After Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was re-installed during a coup by the CIA in 1953, the SAVAK security and intelligence service was founded. Millions of people were either tortured or murdered during his rein. After the Islamic Revolution overthrew the Shah, human rights groups continued to complain of human rights abuses in Iran. Among them were “death squads” in the form of killings of civilians by government agents that were denied by the government. This was particularly the case during the 1990s when more than 80 writers, translators, poets, political activists, and ordinary citizens who had been critical of the government in some way, disappeared or were found murdered. During the same time that the Islamic Revolution began, Saddam Hussein was installed as the dictator of Iraq. This happened to be during the time that George H.W. Bush, Sr. was running the CIA. Are you connecting the dots?

Al-Qaeda is a CIA and Pakistan ISI created terrorist group. Hamas was nurtured from the ground up by Israel’s Mossad and Institute for Intelligence and Special Tasks. Al-Jihad is financed and supported by the Muslim Brotherhood, a British and U.S. intelligence asset. The Neo-cons orchestrated 9/11 and claimed that Muslims did it so they could justify invading Afghanistan, Iraq and in the near future, Iran.

Battalion 316 which also murdered or tortured many people received substantial financial support and training from the United States Central Intelligence Agency. There are many other CIA financed and trained death squads that have been heavily involved in Central and South America.

James W. von Brunn wasn’t the “lone-wolf” that has been reported in the press, but is in fact an operative who was clandestinely installed by the FBI to discredit those who are opposed to certain policies of the federal government not to mention human rights abuses committed on behalf of the American people.

Under COINTELPRO, the FBI provided covert aid to the Ku Klux Klan, Minutemen, Nazis, and other racist vigilantes. The Elohim City “settlement” connected to documented government operative Timothy McVeigh and linked to the Aryan Nations and other white supremacists groups was in fact operated by the Southern Poverty Law Center and the FBI.

Other nations have also engaged in false flag operations most notably the Nazi Party starting the Reichstag Fire and blaming it on the Jews.

The Black Bloc anarchists are a notorious government front. In keeping with the well-documented “strategy of tension” technique pioneered by the CIA-NATO contrivance Gladio, so-called anarchists (who were police agents provocateurs) engaged in violence during the anti-globalist Genoa protests in 2001. During the Montebello globalist summit in Quebec in 2007, several “anarchists” were outed as police agents.

Often times, the “authorities” urge citizens to actively become snoops and instructs them to consider innocuous behavior as suspected terrorist activity. People who refuse to sign up for medicare and/or social security or value privacy are to be considered possible terrorists, as well as those who make “unusual purchases” or have “numerous visitors/meetings” i.e. bible study groups or business members who have networking meetings during evening hours.

Be careful! Things are not always what they appear to be.